THE FRAGMENT
THE FRAGMENT: TOWARDS A HISTORY AND POETICS OF A PERFORMATIVE GENRE
CAMELIA ELIAS
This monograph is an interdisciplinary study of the concept of ‘fragment’ in literature and in critical and literary theory. It discusses the fragment’s performativity and function within a historical perspective, stretching from Heraclitus, via the German Romantics and European writers of the Modernist period, to American postmodern manifestations of the fragment.
This is the first history of the fragment to appear in English, and it is also the first attempt at producing a consistent taxonomy of literary and critical fragments. The fragments are categorised according to function, not author intention, and the study addresses a number of questions: What constitutes the fragment when the fragment can only be defined a posteriori? Does the fragment begin on its own, or is it begun by others, writers and critics? Does it acquire a name of its own, or is it labeled by others?
All these questions revolve around issues of agency, and they are best discussed in terms of performativity, which means seeing fragments as acts: acts of literature, acts of reading, acts of writing. The book demonstrates how a poetics of the fragment as a performative genre can be created, situating the fragment both as literature and as a phenomenon within postmodern criticism (especially in poststructuralist, deconstructive theory which tends towards a fragmentary style itself) against the background of philosophy, art history, and theology.
This work was first published in 2004 by Peter Lang, Bern in the series Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften. This reprint features minor edits.
6×9” | B&W | 465 pp
ISBN 978-8792633750
CATEGORY
Literary criticism
EDITIONS
Standard paperback 2021 | $29
NOTE
A comparative literature monograph.
REVIEWS
Camelia Elias’s rich monograph not only offers a thought-provoking exploration of the fragment, but also a valid “tool kit” for all those interested in experimental forms of writing, be it at the level of theory or praxis. This is a study which no theorist of the textual fragment will be able to ignore. — FRANCA BELARSI, Université Libre de Bruxelles
